🔗 Share this article

The federal government seemed ready on Wednesday to send dozens of law enforcement personnel to the San Francisco Bay Area for a significant border security initiative, sparking condemnation from state officials.

Details of the Deployment

Information of the deployment were continuing to unfold, but it will reportedly include over a hundred government officers, as reported. The officers are expected to begin utilizing the military installation in Alameda, across the bay from San Francisco. It was still uncertain whether military personnel would also be involved.

Government Backlash

The deployment is the result of months of threats by the administration to take action against the progressive municipality. The state's leader Gavin Newsom denounced the action, describing it as “taken directly from the authoritarian playbook”.

“He deploys covered agents, he deploys border agents, he dispatches immigration officials, he instills anxiety and fear in the community so that he can take credit for solving that by deploying the national guard,” Newsom said. “This is exactly like the arsonist fighting the inferno.”

Local Planning

San Francisco is the latest large urban area focused on by Donald Trump’s campaign of large-scale detentions. The operation is anticipated to provoke a showdown between the White House and local leaders who have pledged to block militarized immigration enforcement in the city.

San Franciscans have been preparing for weeks for Trump to carry out ongoing warnings to send troops to the city. At a Wednesday public announcement, San Francisco’s city leader stated again that the city was prepared.

“Over recent weeks, we have been preparing for the likelihood of some kind of government operation in our city,” said the mayor, noting that he had implemented additional measures on Wednesday to “bolster the city’s protection of our foreign-born residents, and ensure our offices are organized ahead of any federal deployment.”

Constitutional Background

In spite of court battles to deployments in a several municipalities, including Illinois, the Pacific Northwest and Los Angeles, Trump has declared “complete control” to deploy the national guard in cities, citing the presidential authority which permits presidents certain rights to send forces on American territory.

Local Preparation

Newsom, who once held office as San Francisco’s city leader – had pledged to take action “without delay” to a mission in the city. “The concept that the White House can deploy troops into our cities with no legitimate cause based on facts, no oversight, no answerability, no consideration of regional control – it’s a direct assault on the legal system,” he said on Wednesday.

Public associations, including civil rights groups created during the previous presidential term, have organized to rapidly assemble a public demonstration in the city, as well as peaceful assemblies at community centers.

Neighborhood Consequences

In San Francisco’s Mission district, a predominantly Latino community, elected official told reporters last week she and her residents had been preparing for this time. “The moment that people stop going to work, when minority individuals are afraid to go outdoors without the apprehension of government officers targeting based on race and apprehending them, the point when parents stop sending kids to school, are too scared to go to the food market or medical provider,” she said. “Our ongoing preparations in the Mission is fundamentally a halt the scale of which we haven’t seen since the pandemic.”

State Troops Status

Approximately 300 out of 4,000 regional national guard troops remain federalized under an command from Trump. Approximately several hundred of them had been transferred to the neighboring state, where they were remaining in uncertainty during a judicial dispute over their deployment.

This period, Newsom said he had summoned the California national guard troops under his control to staff food banks throughout the federal closure.